![]() ![]() ( Note: SiSoftware released SP3a five minutes after this article went live. We tested on a brand-new OS install to double-check things, and it still continued to fail. The Black-Scholes result is extremely favorable towards the VII, and from a cost perspective, the Monte Carlo scaling is strong with the VII as well.įor the curious, we’re not sure why the Radeon Pro WX 8200 failed to run any of the FP16 tests, but based on the simple error of “GPGPU call failed”, it seems like the driver simply didn’t like this test on this particular card. NVIDIA’s Tensor cores clearly don’t do much acceleration here. The financial results paint a better picture for the TITAN Xp and P6000, as long as we’re only talking about Binomial. It doubles the Quadro RTX 4000’s fast Fourier transform performance, and sees another big boost in the N-Body simulation. Against those, the Radeon VII performs extremely well. That’s easily seen when you look at the TITAN Xp and Quadro P6000 results. With RX Vega, AMD offered uncapped FP16 performance, while NVIDIA did no such thing on Pascal GeForce. NVIDIA’s obsession with deep-learning has led it to dominate the FP16 charts here, thanks to the RTX series’ inclusion of Tensor cores. In our compute-focused look at the Radeon VII, we included only single-precision performance results, as at that time, we hadn’t been able to dig into the others (remember, AMD dropped the FP64 bombshell just last night.) The graphs below include those same FP32 results, as well as half- and double-precision results, helping us appreciate what AMD’s kind VBIOS update has given us. Maybe its lack of use is simply because so little hardware supports it, but in truth, very little actually needs that level of precision outside of the sciences. In fact, FP64 is very rare in any kind of day-to-day software even the various CAD and simulation projects rarely use it. ![]() If you’re not in those high-precision fields, what does FP64 performance bring to the table for us common folk, the gamers and content creators? Sadly, not a lot. If you are in research, simulation, financial analysis, or are generally in need of high precision, this unexpected boost is going to make the Radeon VII a very enticing card, since FP64 is typically only found on very expensive GPUs, namely NVIDIA’s Tesla series and the TITAN V, or AMD’s Radeon Instinct range. These results will also let us see if anything is going on under the hood with NVIDIA’s Tensor cores on RTX’s Turing architecture. While we were at it, we also wanted to take a look at FP16 half-precision results, since AI and deep-learning are quickly becoming ubiquitous in our computing, even outside of research. AMD originally told us that this amounted to 3.52 TFLOPS, but the company dropped that slightly to 3.46 TFLOPS after embargo lift.Īfter our original articles were posted, we went through our data a bit more carefully, and threw together a few charts to highlight Radeon VII’s strengths in different high-precision workloads. Fast-forward to the day before embargo, and we get an email from AMD about a boost to FP64: from the 1:16 FP32 we were told last month, to an impressive 1:4 FP32 at launch. At the time, it was widely speculated that the VII would inherit this FP64 performance, but that was shot down after we contacted AMD’s head of marketing.ĭuring testing, we noticed some oddities with the claim of unaccelerated FP64 performance, as we were seeing some much higher results than we expected. That’s an enterprise-grade GPU with uncapped double-precision floating-point compute. When AMD announced the Radeon VII at CES, it was obvious that the card shared many characteristics with its bigger brother, the Radeon Instinct MI50. Now that the rush to meet the embargo is over, we can look into some of the more quirky aspects of Radeon VII. While the card traded blows with NVIDIA’s comparable GeForce RTX 2080, there were a few cases where the Radeon VII really came into its own.ĭue to time constraints, we couldn’t fit all of the tests we wanted to into our launch articles. With this week’s release of AMD’s Radeon VII, we’ve taken a look at performance for both gaming, and professional workloads. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |